Systems of Disease and Wellness-
As one who seeks foundational Public Health interventions, I can conclude that political platforms and policies determine the health of large populations within and among nations. At the national and international levels, a reasonable theoretical argument is that ideological extremism tends to reduce the health of nations overall.
Measured by all-cause excess mortality, is it not likely that militaristic nations tend to disrupt healthcare infrastructure, divert GDP away from healthcare, have illiberal political ideologies and tend toward extremism? Publications by Daniel E. Dawes about Political Determinants of Health have clarified the upstream foundations of social determinants of health. He writes that national laws and policies "either advance health equity or exacerbate health inequities" Voting policies and laws were specifically mentioned. As a current example, political repression of participation by 'partisan' gerrymandering has clearly produced disparate and negative impacts on populations' health. This national practice, done in the USA for example, to misrepresent the will of all voters is also accomplished in the United Nations by it's voting practices within the UN Security Council.While bombs and bullets increase death and illness (including behavioral and epigenetic conditions), cognitive warfare and ethnocratic laws are coming into focus as major drivers that undermine population health. Civilianizing cognitive warfare and law warfare by bringing concepts like second order cybernetics and behavioral economics into Public Health is a matter of national, global and ecological security. Salutogenic theories and the Social-Ecological model offer opportunities to institutionalize structural wellness, systemic healthcare peace-making as well as operationalize Transitional Justice in healthcare.
MED+Works | 2 Improve










